Flowers For Algernon - Comparing And Contrasting Essay -- essays resea

Many popular smarts argon often converted into television movies. The brilliant fiction novel, Flowers for Algernon written by Daniel Keyes, was developed into a dramatic television film. Flowers for Algernon is about a mentally retarded man who is given the opportunity to become intelligent through and through the advancements of medical science. This emotionally touching novel was adapted to television so it could appeal to a wider, to a greater extent general audience. Although the novel and film ar similar in terms of eyepatch and theme, they atomic number 18 different in terms of instances.The plot of both the novel and film version of Flowers for Algernon conduct common similarities. They both feature a retarded middle-aged man, Charlie Gordon, who receives an consummation to heighten his intelligence. Charlies IQ eventually surpasses human normalcy to bring out that the experiment did prove successful. In both the film and novel, Charlie became even more intelligent than the professors who worked with him. In the film, Dr. Strauss was embarrassed to reveal that Charlie was smarter than him. That played a milest whizz event in Charlies identification of himself. Slowly his intelligence began to fall and he eventually returned to his original state of mind. Throughout the story, Charlie encountered many different emotions that he had never experienced before because he didnt reach the common knowledge to understand them. The episode when he was at the golf-club with his co-workers gave him the opportunity to experience betrayal and anger. I never knew before that Joe and detent and the others managed to have me around just to make fun of me (Keyes 30). The plot for both versions also carefully depicted Charlies psychological traumas that he suffered after his operation. These outbursts were often caused by romantic anxiety and the painful memories he would recall. Whenever Charlie got intimate with Alice he would tend to get extremely nervo us or have a hallucination, causing him to ruin the moment. I dropped a fork, and when I tried to retrieve it, I knocked over a glass of body of water and spilled it on her dress (56). One of Charlies most painful memories was the one about the locket incident. Both versions did a great job of emphasizing this contingent moment. His clothes are torn, his nose is bleeding and one of his teeth is distressed (38). These flashbacks occurred many times in the novel yet the f... ...n the woman at the bar in the movie. Norma, Charlies sister, was another important character who wasnt featured in the film. She was part of the reason why Charlie was sent away. As a child she hated Charlie because he would constantly ruin things for her, like the A-Paper incident. Not you. You dont tell. Its my mark, and Im passing play to tell (81). She always felt like Charlie was a nuisance as well Hes like a baby (81). In the film, Rose wasnt as senile as the novel portrayed her. She seemed to have Normas sense of compassion from the novel which made her character rather puzzling. In conclusion, there was a difference of characters in the film.Although the novel and film are similar in terms of plot and theme, they are different in terms of characters. Charlies emotions and personal trials were a sizeable part of both plots because the whole story is about his personal development and experiences. Intolerance was an important issue in the life of Charlie Gordon because it was hard for him to be accepted anywhere else but the bakery. Although some of the original characters were removed from the film, their personalities were incorporated into that of another character.