Little Enough Or Too Much Essay Essay

The case Little overflowing or Too Much describes a participation which produces a invigorated industrial lubricant by the name of Chemical X. With acclamation from the government, the telephoner dumps all excess chemical substance waste into a nigh river, commonly used by other producers, and in the work knead chooses eliminate an addition step which would have led to reduced toss of chemical waste. This is done in separate to ensure cost efficiencies and competitiveness, however, a worker by the name of Bryan believes follow through should be taken in order to protect the surround and live up to the connections promise of environmental consciousness, with the potential pollution and harm posed by this current unconscious process. Having already expressed his concerns to plant supervisor Bill Gates, it is understandably that altering the current plan is not of any concern to the company (Heist, 1992). This case brings light to a very important example come out Does B ryan have any obligation or responsibility for taking do and informing others in order to ensure that this issue is heady? sightedness as the company currently perceives no reason to agnize adjustments to the intersection process, with their investment currently thriving, this puts Bryan in a very difficult position.However, in that respect atomic pattern 18 possible radicals. Bryan could try and gather enough data from the engineers and chemists voluminous in the production process which would provide turn up to Bryans concerns and malign Bill Gates with his findings. Alternatively, he could approach souls outside of the organization, such as the government, to see that action is taken to solve the problem (Little enough or, 1992). Based on the ethical theory of righteous excellence ethics, which emphasizes decisions to be made based upon ones suffer moral character, Bryan does and then have an obligation to inform others of the necessity of this issue to be re solved and therefor, should take action. deservingness ethics teaches us that individuals should make decisions based on their own character and personal beliefs, rather than relying on external laws and tradition of a persons culture (Gowdy, 2013). It is made clear that Bryan is extremely uncomfortable with the decisions macrocosm made by the company and does not believe they are right.With the governments authorisation for additional waste discarding and the evident approval among supervisors and co-workers, benefiting from the growth in profits through the firms profit-sharing program, Bryans current business culture seems to contradict his inner beliefs. However, according to virtue ethics, thesefactors should not influence his final decision and therefor it would be analytic for him to pursue this issue. Similarly, this theory places great emphasis on directing an individuals attention away from popular belief and focusing on ones own opinion and thoughts (Gowdy, 2013). Br yan should then not let his own judgement be clouded, merely be apparent movement others do not status the situation from his perspective, and listen to his instincts which appear to be telling him that the company is qualification a huge mistake. Referring back to Greek thinkers Plato and Aristotle, it is said that individuals should ultimately make decisions which reinforce key virtues such as courage, justice and honesty, and that through legitimate application, individuals are able to acquire good habits of character.Ultimately, this pull up stakes cause them to be able to better regulate their emotions and make morally correct decisions when go about with difficulties (Cline, n.d.). Based on this, in order to ensure that Bryan continues to make moral decisions throughout the rest of his life and is able to truly live virtuously, he should make an attempt to have the additional step devoured into the production process, thus reducing the totality of pollution. This is bec ause such a decision would debunk the characteristic of courage on Bryans behalf, given that he is being faced with peers only interested in the current benefits being presented to them currency and short-term organizational success. These motives of greed would then fall under the course of study of bad habits, or vices, which Bryan should avoid in order to make moral decisions (Cline, n.d.). While Bryan is able to see the benefits of this product, as perceived by his peers, he cannot ignore the fact that excess pollution will most in all probability cause more problems for the company in the future. With the river being located so closely to the factory, if evidence does prove that excess chemical waste will have extremely noxious health effects, this not only puts the local anesthetic environment and wildlife in danger, but also the lives of the factorys workers if the landfill continues to grow.Therefore, attempting to defame these effects would satisfy the virtue of justi ce. Other ethical theories such as Utilitarianism may argue that since the current production process is causing an increase in profits, quite substantial when compared to the past few mediocre quarters, choosing to bring home the bacon the current process as it is will benefit the greatest number of people (Utilitarianism, 2007). However, as Bryan identifies, this is merely a short term bulge ofbenefits. The company has not taken into consideration the costs of implementing this additional step, as well as the potential harm from pollution in their analysis. not to mention the fact that the company is technically lying to the public. While the company publicly states that all actions are taken in order to downplay harmful environmental effects, Chemical X proves this statement to be false. If almost consumers purchased this product because they believed they were doing good for the environment, as apparently advertised, they would be deceived entirely.Essentially, it is as if th e consumers are being greenwashed by being fed false development in for hopes of organizational benefits, although no extensive marketing campaign has been execute (Furlow, 2010).While the company believes that slowing down production in order to implement this additional step will only draw attention to themselves and cause suspicion from environmental groups, would it not be worse if they were to discover this treason down the road, only after the lie had snowballed over many eld? At least if they were to correct this mistake now, they would be able to mystify this image of ecological concern by actively solving problems and admitting to their own errors in judgement. In order to satisfy the issues presented in this case, the ethical solution would be for Bryan to reproach Bill Gates and convince him that the additional human body in production must be implemented.This would be achieved by contacting the engineers and chemists twisty in the production of Chemical X in order to earn concrete evidence that the current plan will be harmful and support Bryans claim (Little Enough or, 1992). Considering the amount of safety precautions taken and training requirement on behalf of employees within chemical factories, there surely must be some sort of evidence to prove the damaging effects of their current process in order to draw attention to change. If it was then agreed upon to proceed with this plan, it would help to diminish the harmful effects on the environment and factory in general. In addition to Bryan being able to make a moral decision which will help him maintain a virtuous character in future difficulties, this would potentially have a positive effect on the character of other employees.Previously, the company was being dishonest to the public regarding their ecological motives which over time could have reinforced the concept that dishonesty in the workplace is acceptable and feed into greed, both vices for which no employer shouldencourage. By life history up to the companys initial claim, this would potentially help relapse these effects. In conclusion, Bryan should follow his own beliefs and personal character and take action towards having the company implement an additional step in the production process of Chemical X. Thus, enabling him to make proper moral decisions in the future, hold back key virtues and minimize potential harmful effects on the environment and health of factory workers. Despite being a new employee and the stem that Bryan should avoid being a troublemaker, it cannot be simply denied that there is some form of injustice in this case and simply ignoring such injustice would stain ones own moral character.ReferencesCline, A. (n.d.). Virtue Ethics Morality and Character. Retrieved November 28, 2014, from http//atheism.about.com/od/ethicalsystems/a/virtueethics.htm Furlow, N. (2010). Greenwashing in the New Millennium. The diary of Applied Business and Economics, 10(6), 22-25. Retrieved Novemb er 28, 2014, from ABI/INFORM Global. Gowdy, L. (2013, October 15). Virtue Ethics. Retrieved November 28, 2014, from http//www.ethicsmorals.com/ethicsvirtue.html Heist, E. (1992, January 1). Little Enough or Too Much. Retrieved November 25, 2014, from https//learn.humber.ca/bbcswebdav/pid-1288113-dt-content-rid-6008416_1/courses/5773.201470/227_case1.pdf Little Enough or Too Much pedagogy Notes. (1992). Retrieved November 28, 2014, from http//wpweb2.tepper.cmu.edu/ethics/AA/mgmt04-notes.pdf Utilitarianism. (2007). In Political philosophy A-Z. Retrieved from http//search.credoreference.com.rap.ocls.ca/content/entry/edinburghppaz/utilitarianism/0